Courts · Monday, September 7, 2026
The Postal Service asks the Court to free its ballot-mail rule.
The File desk · Sep. 7, 2026, 10:18 a.m. ET
Confirmed4 primary sources
Status
- ConfirmedSaturday, Sept. 6, 2026: the United States Postal Service and the Justice Department filed Supreme Court application 26A305, seeking a stay of the Sept. 4 preliminary injunction from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ordered any response by 4 p.m. Eastern on Sept. 9. Applicants include Postmaster General David Steiner.
- ConfirmedThe same day, the Solicitor General withdrew the earlier stay application 26A297, filed Sept. 3. The Sept. 4 injunction, the government says, blocks mandatory parts of the Postal Service’sfinal rule. Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia are listed as California-side respondents. Alabama and 11 other states appear as intervenors supporting the government.
Legal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
- Partially confirmedThe stay application says First Circuit stay motions were filed Sept. 5 in Nos. 26-2029 and 26-2031. This desk does not have a First Circuit order. Whether the Supreme Court grants an administrative stay, or the full stay, is not decided.
Legal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
Legal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
Legal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
Legal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
Legal instrument
Executive Order 14399, Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections
This presidential order directed additional federal measures around citizenship verification and mail ballots in federal elections. The Postal Service’s ballot-mail rule cites it as background.
Legal instrument
Executive Order 14399, Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections
This presidential order directed additional federal measures around citizenship verification and mail ballots in federal elections. The Postal Service’s ballot-mail rule cites it as background.
How we know
What is still unknown or disputed
- Whether the Court grants an administrative stay or the full stay.
- First Circuit posture: stay motions are listed as filed Sept. 5; no First Circuit order is in this lock.
- The stay application and Justice Jackson’s docket order do not name the district judge.
Primary sources
Every claim in this story is drawn from the documents below. If a fetch failed, that is recorded on the card.
Source 1
Docket for 26A305, United States Postal Service, et al., Applicants v. California, et al.
Supreme Court of the United States · September 6, 2026
Application (26A305) for a stay, submitted to Justice Jackson. Order entered by Justice Jackson: The Solicitor General has withdrawn the stay application filed on September 3, 2026 (26A297) and now seeks a stay of the preliminary injunction entered by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on September 4, 2026. It is hereby ordered that any response to the new application (26A305) be filed by 4 p.m. (EDT) on September 9, 2026.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26a305.html
Source 2
Application for a stay of the injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and request for an immediate administrative stay (No. 26A305)
Solicitor General / Supreme Court docket PDF · September 6, 2026
Applicants include the United States Postal Service and David Steiner, Postmaster General. Respondents in California include 23 states and the District of Columbia, plus Josh Shapiro, Governor of Pennsylvania. Intervenor-defendants include Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Texas. The application seeks a stay of the Sept. 4 preliminary injunction and an immediate administrative stay. Related First Circuit stay motions filed Sept. 5 in Nos. 26-2029 and 26-2031.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/26/26A305/423226/20260906094442523_USPS%20v.%20State%20of%20California%20PI%20No.%2026A%20-%20Stay%20App.pdf
Source 3
Letter withdrawing stay application No. 26A297
Office of the Solicitor General · September 6, 2026
On Friday, September 4, 2026, the district court formally issued a preliminary injunction that was substantively identical to its August 27 order. The United States appealed that injunction the same evening, and it filed a motion the next day in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Earlier today the United States filed a new application for a stay. The United States withdraws its September 3 stay application in No. 26A297.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/26/26A297/423227/20260906111028101%5F26A297%5FUSPS%5FLetter.pdf
Source 4
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections
Federal Register (U.S. Postal Service final rule) · August 26, 2026
Postal Service final rule,
(Aug. 26, 2026), Doc. 2026-17238. Envelope-design and data-reporting standards for Federal Ballot Mail, including aLegal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
. CitesLegal instrument
Ballot Mail for Federal Elections (U.S. Postal Service final rule)
This Postal Service final rule sets envelope-design and data-reporting standards for mail-in and absentee ballots in federal elections, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal. A Massachusetts federal judge has blocked mandatory parts for the Nov. 3, 2026 midterms pending further court action.
, 91 FR 17125. Notes the Nov. 3, 2026 general election and existing District of Massachusetts injunctions.Legal instrument
Executive Order 14399, Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections
This presidential order directed additional federal measures around citizenship verification and mail ballots in federal elections. The Postal Service’s ballot-mail rule cites it as background.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/26/2026-17238/ballot-mail-for-federal-elections